Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Insights into the effect of nitric oxide and its metabolites nitrite and nitrate at inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia

  1. Author:
    Vavra, A. K.
    Havelka, G. E.
    Martinez, J.
    Lee, V. R.
    Fu, B.
    Jiang, Q.
    Keefer, L. K.
    Kibbe, M. R.
  2. Author Address

    [Vavra, AK; Havelka, GE; Martinez, J; Lee, VR; Fu, B; Jiang, Q; Kibbe, MR] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Vasc Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA [Vavra, AK; Havelka, GE; Martinez, J; Lee, VR; Fu, B; Jiang, Q; Kibbe, MR] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Inst BioNanotechnol Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA [Keefer, LK] NCI, Ctr Canc Res, Frederick, MD 21702 USA;Kibbe, MR (reprint author), Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Vasc Surg, 676 N St Clair St,650, Chicago, IL 60611 USA;mkibbe@nmh.org
    1. Year: 2011
    2. Date: Jun
  1. Journal: Nitric Oxide-Biology and Chemistry
    1. 25
    2. 1
    3. Pages: 22-30
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 1089-8603
  1. Abstract:

    Objective: Periadventitial delivery of the nitric oxide (NO) donor PROLI/NO following arterial injury effectively inhibits neointimal hyperplasia. Given the short half-life of NO release from PROLI/NO, our goal was to determine if inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia by PROLI/NO was due to NO, or its metabolites nitrite and nitrate. Methods and results: In vitro, the NO donor DETA/NO inhibited proliferation of rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (RASMC), but neither nitrite nor nitrate did. In vivo, following rat carotid artery balloon injury or injury plus the molar equivalents of PROLI/NO, nitrite, or nitrate (n = 8-11/group), PROLI/NO was found to provide superior inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia (82% inhibition of intimal area, and 44% inhibition of medial area, p < 0.001). Only modest inhibition was noted with nitrite or nitrate (45% and 41% inhibition of intimal area, and 31% and 29% inhibition of medial area, respectively, p < 0.001). No effects on blood pressure were noted with any treatment groups. In vivo, only PROLI/NO inhibited cellular proliferation and increased arterial lumen area compared to injury alone (p < 0.001). However, all three treatments inhibited inflammation (p < 0.001). Conclusions: PROLI/NO was more effective at inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia following arterial injury than nitrite or nitrate. However, modest inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia was observed with nitrite and nitrate, likely secondary to anti-inflammatory actions. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the efficacy of NO donors is primarily due to NO production and not its metabolites, nitrite and nitrate. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2011.04.013
  2. WOS: 000292411900003

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2010-2011
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel