Skip NavigationSkip to Content

LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification.

  1. Author:
    Armato, Samuel G
    Drukker, Karen
    Li, Feng
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Tourassi, Georgia D
    Engelmann, Roger M
    Giger, Maryellen L
    Redmond, George
    Farahani, Keyvan
    Kirby, Justin S
    Clarke, Laurence P
  2. Author Address

    The University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States., University of Michigan , Department of Radiology, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States., Health Data Sciences Institute , Biomedical Science and Engineering Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. 160;Box 2008 MS6085 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6085, United States., National Cancer Institute , Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States., Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. , Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Cancer Imaging Program, 8560 Progress Drive, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.,
    1. Year: 2016
    2. Date: Oct
  1. Journal: Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
    1. 3
    2. 4
    3. Pages: 044506
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. Article Number: 044506
  1. Abstract:

    The purpose of this work is to describe the LUNGx Challenge for the computerized classification of lung nodules on diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans as benign or malignant and report the performance of participants 39; computerized methods along with that of six radiologists who participated in an observer study performing the same Challenge task on the same dataset. The Challenge provided sets of calibration and testing scans, established a performance assessment process, and created an infrastructure for case dissemination and result submission. Ten groups applied their own methods to 73 lung nodules (37 benign and 36 malignant) that were selected to achieve approximate size matching between the two cohorts. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for these methods ranged from 0.50 to 0.68; only three methods performed statistically better than random guessing. The radiologists 39; AUC values ranged from 0.70 to 0.85; three radiologists performed statistically better than the best-performing computer method. The LUNGx Challenge compared the performance of computerized methods in the task of differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on CT scans, placed in the context of the performance of radiologists on the same task. The continued public availability of the Challenge cases will provide a valuable resource for the medical imaging research community.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.044506
  2. PMID: 28018939
  3. PMCID: PMC5166709

Library Notes

NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel