Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Telomere length and epigenetic clocks as markers of cellular aging: a comparative study

  1. Author:
    Pearce, Emily E
    Alsaggaf, Rotana
    Katta,Shilpa
    Dagnall,Casey
    Aubert, Geraldine
    Hicks,Belynda
    Spellman, Stephen R
    Savage, Sharon A
    Horvath, Steve
    Gadalla, Shahinaz M
  2. Author Address

    Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. emily.pearce@nih.gov., Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA., Terry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada., Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN, 55401, USA., Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.,
    1. Year: 2022
    2. Date: May 18
    3. Epub Date: 2022 05 18
  1. Journal: GeroScience
  2. Type of Article: Article
  1. Abstract:

    Telomere length (TL) and DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks are markers of biological age, but the relationship between the two is not fully understood. Here, we used multivariable regression models to evaluate the relationships between leukocyte TL (LTL; measured by qPCR [n?=?635] or flow FISH [n?=?144]) and five epigenetic clocks (Hannum, DNAmAge pan-tissue, PhenoAge, SkinBlood, or GrimAge clocks), or their epigenetic age acceleration measures in healthy adults (age 19-61 years). LTL showed statistically significant negative correlations with all clocks (qPCR: r?=??-?0.26 to?-?0.32; flow FISH: r?=??-?0.34 to?-?0.49; p?< ?0.001 for all). Yet, models adjusted for age, sex, and race revealed significant associations between three of five clocks (PhenoAge, GrimAge, and Hannum clocks) and LTL by flow FISH (p?< ?0.01 for all) or qPCR (p?< ?0.001 for all). Significant associations between age acceleration measures for the same three clocks and qPCR or flow FISH TL were also found (p?< ?0.01 for all). Additionally, LTL (by qPCR or flow FISH) showed significant associations with extrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (EEAA: p?< ?0.0001 for both), but not intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (IEAA; p?>?0.05 for both). In conclusion, the relationships between LTL and epigenetic clocks were limited to clocks reflecting phenotypic age. The observed association between LTL and EEAA reflects the ability of both measures to detect immunosenescence. The observed modest correlations between LTL and epigenetic clocks highlight a possible benefit from incorporating both measures in understanding disease etiology and prognosis. © 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-022-00586-4
  2. PMID: 35585300
  3. PII : 10.1007/s11357-022-00586-4

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2021-2022
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel