Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Moderate to Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Phase 2a Trial

  1. Author:
    Sasson, Jennifer
    Donlan, Alexandra N
    Ma, Jennie Z
    Haughey, Heather M
    Coleman, Rachael
    Nayak, Uma
    Mathers, Amy J
    Laverdure,Sylvain
    Dewar,Robin
    Jackson, Patrick E H
    Heysell, Scott K
    Sturek, Jeffrey M
    Petri, William A
  2. Author Address

    Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA., Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA., Center for Public Health Genomics and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA., Laboratory of Human Retrovirology and Immunoinformatics, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, USA., Virus Isolation and Serology Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, USA.,
    1. Year: 2022
    2. Date: Aug
    3. Epub Date: 2022 07 27
  1. Journal: Open Forum Infectious Diseases
    1. 9
    2. 8
    3. Pages: ofac343
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. Article Number: ofac343
  1. Abstract:

    Based on studies implicating the type 2 cytokine interleukin 13 (IL-13) as a potential contributor to critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this trial was designed as an early phase 2 study to assess dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-13 and interleukin 4 signaling, for treatment of inpatients with COVID-19. We conducted a phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04920916) to assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab plus standard of care vs placebo plus standard of care in mitigating respiratory failure and death in those hospitalized with COVID-19. Forty eligible subjects were enrolled from June to November of 2021. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events nor in the primary endpoint of ventilator-free survival at day 28 between study arms. However, for the secondary endpoint of mortality at day 60, there were 2 deaths in the dupilumab group compared with 5 deaths in the placebo group (60-day survival: 89.5% vs 76.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.05 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .004-.72]; P?=?.03). Among subjects who were not in the intensive care unit (ICU) at randomization, 3 subjects in the dupilumab arm were admitted to the ICU compared to 6 in the placebo arm (17.7% vs 37.5%; adjusted HR, 0.44 [95% CI, .09-2.09]; P?=?.30). Last, we found evidence of type 2 signaling blockade in the dupilumab group through analysis of immune biomarkers over time. Although the primary outcome of day 28 ventilator-free survival was not reached, adverse events were not observed and survival was higher in the dupilumab group by day 60. NCT04920916. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac343
  2. PMID: 35959207
  3. PMCID: PMC9361171
  4. PII : ofac343

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2021-2022
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel