Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Creation and preclinical evaluation of a novel mussel-inspired, biomimetic, bioactive bone graft scaffold: direct comparison with Infuse bone graft using a rat model of spinal fusion

  1. Author:
    Cottrill, Ethan
    Pennington, Zach
    Wolf,Matthew
    Dirckx, Naomi
    Ehresman, Jeff
    Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander
    Rajkovic, Christian
    Lin, Jessica
    Maestas, David R
    Mageau, Ashlie
    Lambrechts, Dennis
    Stewart, Veronica
    Sciubba, Daniel M
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Elisseeff, Jennifer H
    Witham, Timothy
  2. Author Address

    Departments of1Neurosurgery., 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina., 4Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., 2Biomedical Engineering, and., 5Laboratory of Cancer Immunometabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland., 6Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland., 7Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona., Departments of8Chemistry and., 9Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and., 10Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Hempstead, New York.,
    1. Year: 2023
    2. Date: Mar 31
    3. Epub Date: 2023 03 31
  1. Journal: Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine
    1. 39
    2. 1
    3. Pages: 113-121
  2. Type of Article: Article
  1. Abstract:

    Infuse bone graft is a widely used osteoinductive adjuvant; however, the simple collagen sponge scaffold used in the implant has minimal inherent osteoinductive properties and poorly controls the delivery of the adsorbed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). In this study, the authors sought to create a novel bone graft substitute material that overcomes the limitations of Infuse and compare the ability of this material with that of Infuse to facilitate union following spine surgery in a clinically translatable rat model of spinal fusion. The authors created a polydopamine (PDA)-infused, porous, homogeneously dispersed solid mixture of extracellular matrix and calcium phosphates (BioMim-PDA) and then compared the efficacy of this material directly with Infuse in the setting of different concentrations of rhBMP-2 using a rat model of spinal fusion. Sixty male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to each of six equal groups: 1) collagen + 0.2 µg rhBMP-2/side, 2) BioMim-PDA + 0.2 µg rhBMP-2/side, 3) collagen + 2.0 µg rhBMP-2/side, 4) BioMim-PDA + 2.0 µg rhBMP-2/side, 5) collagen + 20 µg rhBMP-2/side, and 6) BioMim-PDA + 20 µg rhBMP-2/side. All animals underwent posterolateral intertransverse process fusion at L4-5 using the assigned bone graft. Animals were euthanized 8 weeks postoperatively, and their lumbar spines were analyzed via microcomputed tomography (µCT) and histology. Spinal fusion was defined as continuous bridging bone bilaterally across the fusion site evaluated via µCT. The fusion rate was 100% in all groups except group 1 (70%) and group 4 (90%). Use of BioMim-PDA with 0.2 µg rhBMP-2 led to significantly greater results for bone volume (BV), percentage BV, and trabecular number, as well as significantly smaller trabecular separation, compared with the use of the collagen sponge with 2.0 µg rhBMP-2. The same results were observed when the use of BioMim-PDA with 2.0 µg rhBMP-2 was compared with the use of the collagen sponge with 20 µg rhBMP-2. Implantation of rhBMP-2-adsorbed BioMim-PDA scaffolds resulted in BV and bone quality superior to that afforded by treatment with rhBMP-2 concentrations 10-fold higher implanted on a conventional collagen sponge. Using BioMim-PDA (vs a collagen sponge) for rhBMP-2 delivery could significantly lower the amount of rhBMP-2 required for successful bone grafting clinically, improving device safety and decreasing costs.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.3171/2023.2.SPINE22936
  2. PMID: 37021767
  3. WOS: :001033675900006

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2022-2023
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel