Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Distinct allosteric networks in CDK4 and CDK6 in the cell cycle and in drug resistance

  1. Author:
    Zhang,Wengang
    Bradburn, Devin
    Heidebrink, Gretchen
    Liu, Yonglan
    Jang,Hyunbum
    Nussinov,Ruth
    Kõivomägi, Mardo
  2. Author Address

    Cancer Innovation Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA., Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA., Cancer Innovation Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; Computational Structural Biology Section, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA., Cancer Innovation Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; Computational Structural Biology Section, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. Electronic address: NussinoR@mail.nih.gov., Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: mardo.koivomagi@nih.gov.,
    1. Year: 2025
    2. Date: Mar 31
    3. Epub Date: 2025 03 31
  1. Journal: Journal of Molecular Biology
    1. Pages: 169121
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. Article Number: 169121
  1. Abstract:

    Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) are key regulators of the G1-S phase transition in the cell cycle. In cancer cells, CDK6 overexpression often outcompetes CDK4 in driving cell cycle progression, contributing to resistance against CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). This suggests distinct functional and conformational differences between these two kinases, despite their striking structural and sequence similarities. Understanding the mechanisms that differentiate CDK4 and CDK6 is crucial, as resistance to CDK4/6i-frequently linked to CDK6 overexpression-remains a significant therapeutic challenge. Notably, CDK6 is often upregulated in CDK4/6i-resistant cancers and rapidly proliferating hematopoietic stem cells, underscoring its unique regulatory roles. We hypothesize that their distinct conformational dynamics explain their differences in phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein, Rb, inhibitor efficacy, and cell cycle control. This leads us to question how their dissimilar conformational dynamics encode their distinct actions. To elucidate their differential activities, molecular mechanisms, and inhibitor binding, we combine biochemical assays and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We discover that CDK4 and CDK6 have distinct allosteric networks connecting the ß3-aC loop and the G-loop. CDK6 exhibits stronger coupling and shorter path lengths between these regions, resulting in higher kinase activity upon cyclin binding and impacting inhibitor specificity. We also discover an unrecognized role of the unstructured CDK6 C-terminus, which allosterically connects and stabilizes the R-spine, facilitating slightly higher activity. Our findings bridge the gap between the structural similarity and functional divergence of CDK4 and CDK6, advancing the understanding of kinase regulation in cancer biology. Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169121
  2. PMID: 40174666
  3. PII : S0022-2836(25)00187-1

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2024-2025
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel