Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Release factors eRF1 and RF2 - A universal mechanism controls the large conformational changes

  1. Author:
    Ma, B. Y.
    Nussinov, R.
  2. Author Address

    NCI, Basic Res Program, SAIC Frederick Inc, Lab Expt & Computat Biol,NIH, Frederick, MD 21702 USA. Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Dept Human Genet & Mol Med, Sackler Inst Mol Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel Ma, BY, NCI, Basic Res Program, SAIC Frederick Inc, Lab Expt & Computat Biol,NIH, Frederick, MD 21702 USA
    1. Year: 2004
    2. Date: DEC 17
  1. Journal: Journal of Biological Chemistry
    1. 279
    2. 51
    3. Pages: 53875-53885
  2. Type of Article: Article
  1. Abstract:

    Class I release factors 1 and 2 (RF1 and RF2) terminate protein synthesis by recognizing stop codons on the mRNA via their conserved amino acid motifs (NIKS in eRF1 and SPF in RF2) and by the conserved tripeptide (GGQ) interactions with the ribosomal peptidyltransferase center. Crystal structures of eRF1 and RF2 do not fit their ribosomal binding pocket (similar to73 Angstrom). Cryoelectron microscopy indicates large conformational changes in the ribosome-bound RF2. Here, we investigate the conformational dynamics of the eRF1 and RF2 using molecular dynamics simulation, structural alignment, and electrostatic analysis of domain interactions. We show that relaxed eRF1 has a shape remarkably similar to the ribosome-bound RF2 observed by cryoelectron microscopy. The similarity between the two release factors is as good as between elongation factor G and elongation factor Tuguanosine-5'(beta,gamma-imido)triphosphate-tRNA. Further, the conformational transitions and dynamics of eRF1 and RF2 between the free and ribosome-bound states are most likely controlled by protonation of conserved histidines. For eRF1, the distance between the NIKS and GGQ motifs shrinks from 97.5 Angstromin the crystal to 70-80 Angstrom. For RF2, the separation between SPF and GGQ elongates from 32 Angstrom in the crystal to 50 Angstrom. Coulombic interaction strongly favors the open conformation of eRF1; however, solvation and histidine protonation modulate the domain interactions, making the closed conformation of eRF1 more accessible. Thus, RF1 and RF2 function like molecular machines, most likely fueled by histidine protonation. The unified conformational control and the shapes of eRF1 and RF2 support the proposition that the termination of protein synthesis involves similar mechanisms across species

    See More

External Sources

  1. WOS: 000225680600126

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel