Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Pain Assessment Methods and Interventions Used by Pediatric Psychologists: A Survey by the Pain Special Interest Group of the Society of Pediatric Psychology

  1. Author:
    Junghans-Rutelonis, Ashley N
    Weiss, Karen E
    Tamula, Mary Anne
    Karvounides, Dina
    Harbeck-Weber, Cindy
    Martin, Staci
  2. Author Address

    Department of Pain, Palliative Care, and Integrative Medicine, Children 39;s Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA., Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine & Seattle Children 39;s Hospital, Seattle, USA., Clinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., NCI Campus at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 21702, USA., Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children 39;s Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia, USA., Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA., Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.,
    1. Year: 2017
    2. Date: Dec
  1. Journal: Professional psychology, research and practice
    1. 48
    2. 6
    3. Pages: 445-452
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 0735-7028
  1. Abstract:

    Although many valid pain-related assessment instruments and interventions exist, little is known about which are actually utilized in practice and the factors that contribute to pediatric psychologist 39;s decisions about their use. The aim of this survey study was to present a summary of current clinical practice among pediatric psychologists in the area of pediatric pain and to identify the needs and possible resources that would enable practitioners to better implement evidence-based assessments and interventions. To accomplish this aim, the Pain Special Interest Group of the Society of Pediatric Psychology (SPP) constructed an online survey that was sent electronically to current members of the SPP list serve. Results indicated the majority of participants are guided by a theoretical model and are using evidence-based assessments and interventions, although they are not always familiar with the literature supporting their use. Providers noted evidence-based pain intervention is facilitated by assessment tools, intervention resources, and appreciation of pain interventions by multidisciplinary team members. Barriers are both logistical (clinic space and time constraints) and knowledge-based (lack of familiarity with assessments/interventions). Thus, while pediatric psychologists are progressing towards better translation of research to practice, continued educational efforts and communication among practitioners about available resources are warranted.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1037/pro0000156
  2. PMID: 29403147
  3. PMCID: PMC5796542
  4. WOS: 000422905900007

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2017-2018
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel