Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Exposure time versus cytotoxicity for anticancer agents

  1. Author:
    Evans, David M
    Fang,Jianwen
    Silvers,Thomas
    Delosh,Rene
    Laudeman,Julie
    Ogle,Chad
    Reinhart,Russell
    Selby, Michael
    Bowles,Lori
    Connelly,John
    Harris,Erik
    Krushkal, Julia
    Rubinstein, Larry
    Doroshow, James H
    Teicher, Beverly A [ORCID]
  2. Author Address

    Molecular Pharmacology Group, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA., Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA., Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA., Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA. Beverly.Teicher@nih.gov., Molecular Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, RM 4-W602, MSC 9735, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. Beverly.Teicher@nih.gov.,
    1. Year: 2019
    2. Date: AUG
    3. Epub Date: 2019 05 17
  1. Journal: Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
    1. 84
    2. 2
    3. Pages: 359-371
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 0344-5704
  1. Abstract:

    Purpose: Time is a critical factor in drug action. The duration of inhibition of the target or residence time of the drug molecule on the target often guides drug scheduling. Methods: The effects of time on the concentration-dependent cytotoxicity of approved and investigational agents [300 compounds] were examined in the NCI60 cell line panel in 2D at 2, 3, 7 and in 3D 11 days. Results: There was a moderate positive linear relationship between data from the 2-day NCI60 screen and the 3-, 7- and 11-day and a strong positive linear relationship between 3-, 7- and 11-day luminescence screen IC(50)s by Pearson correlation analysis. Cell growth inhibition by agents selective for a specific cell cycle phase plateaued when susceptible cells were growth inhibited or killed. As time increased the depth of cell growth inhibition increased without change in the IC50. DNA interactive agents had decreasing IC(50)s with increasing exposure time. Epigenetic agents required longer exposure times; several were only cytotoxic after 11days' exposure. For HDAC inhibitors, time had little or no effect on concentration response. There were potency differences amongst the three BET bromodomain inhibitors tested, and an exposure duration effect. The PARP inhibitors, rucaparib, niraparib, and veliparib reached IC(50)s< 10 mu M in some cell lines after 11 days. Conclusions: The results suggest that variations in compound exposure time may reflect either mechanism of action or compound chemical half-life. The activity of slow-acting compounds may optimally be assessed in spheroid models that can be monitored over prolonged incubation times.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03863-w
  2. PMID: 31102023
  3. WOS: 000475686400015
  4. PII : 10.1007/s00280-019-03863-w

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2018-2019
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel