Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts

  1. Author:
    Wu, Zeni
    Hullings, Autumn G
    Ghanbari, Reza
    Etemadi, Arash
    Wan,Yunhu
    Zhu,Bin
    Poustchi, Hossein
    Fahraji, Behnam Bagheri
    Sakhvidi, Mohammad Javad Zare
    Shi, Jianxin
    Knight, Rob
    Malekzadeh, Reza
    Sinha, Rashmi
    Vogtmann, Emily
  2. Author Address

    Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA., Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research/Leidos Biomedical Research Laboratory, Inc., Frederick, MD, USA., Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA., Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran., Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran., Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA., Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA., Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA., Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. malek@tums.ac.ir., Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. sinhar@exchange.nih.gov.,
    1. Year: 2021
    2. Date: Nov 22
    3. Epub Date: 2021 11 22
  1. Journal: BMC microbiology
    1. 21
    2. 1
    3. Pages: 324
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. Article Number: 324
  4. ISSN: 1471-2180
  1. Abstract:

    To initiate fecal and oral collections in prospective cohort studies for microbial analyses, it is essential to understand how field conditions and geographic differences may impact microbial communities. This study aimed to investigate the impact of fecal and oral sample collection methods and room temperature storage on collection samples for studies of the human microbiota. We collected fecal and oral samples from participants in two Iranian cohorts located in rural Yazd (n?=?46) and urban Gonbad (n?=?38) and investigated room temperature stability over 4?days of fecal (RNAlater and fecal occult blood test [FOBT] cards) and comparability of fecal and oral (OMNIgene ORAL kits and Scope mouthwash) collection methods. We calculated interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on 3 alpha and 4 beta diversity metrics and the relative abundance of 3 phyla. After 4?days at room temperature, fecal stability ICCs and ICCs for Scope mouthwash were generally high for all microbial metrics. Similarly, the fecal comparability ICCs for RNAlater and FOBT cards were high, ranging from 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.75) for the relative abundance of Firmicutes to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.96) for unweighted Unifrac. Comparability ICCs for OMNIgene ORAL and Scope mouthwash were lower than fecal ICCs, ranging from 0.55 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.70) for the Shannon index to 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.86) for Bray-Curtis. Overall, RNAlater, FOBT cards and Scope mouthwash were stable up to 4?days at room temperature. Samples collected using FOBT cards were generally comparable to RNAlater while the OMNIgene ORAL were less similar to Scope mouthwash. As microbiome measures for feces samples collected using RNAlater, FOBT cards and oral samples collected using Scope mouthwash were stable over four days at room temperature, these would be most appropriate for microbial analyses in these populations. However, one collection method should be consistently since each method may induce some differences. © 2021. The Author(s).

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02387-9
  2. PMID: 34809575
  3. PMCID: PMC8607576
  4. WOS: 000721962600003
  5. PII : 10.1186/s12866-021-02387-9

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2021-2022
NCI at FrederickClose Button

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel