Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Importance of B-Cell responses for immunological control of variant strains of simian immunodeficiency virus

  1. Author:
    Johnson, W. E.
    Lifson, J. D.
    Lang, S. M.
    Johnson, R. P.
    Desrosiers, R. C.
  2. Author Address

    Harvard Univ, Sch Med, New England Reg Primate Res Ctr, 1 Pine Hill Dr,Box 9102, Southborough, MA 01772 USA Harvard Univ, Sch Med, New England Reg Primate Res Ctr, Southborough, MA 01772 USA NCI, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, SAIC Frederick, AIDS Vaccine Program,Lab Retroviral Pathogenesis, Frederick, MD 21702 USA Desrosiers RC Harvard Univ, Sch Med, New England Reg Primate Res Ctr, 1 Pine Hill Dr,Box 9102, Southborough, MA 01772 USA
    1. Year: 2003
  1. Journal: Journal of Virology
    1. 77
    2. 1
    3. Pages: 375-381
  2. Type of Article: Article
  1. Abstract:

    The properties of three variants of cloned simian immunodeficiency virus strain 239 (SIV239) were compared. One strain (M5) lacked five sites for N-linked carbohydrate attachment in variable regions 1 and 2 (V1 and V2) of the gp120 envelope protein, one strain (DeltaV1-V2) completely lacked VI and V2 sequences, and another (316) had nine mutations in the envelope that impart high replicative capacity for tissue macrophages. All three strains were capable of significant levels of fusion independent of CD4, and all three were considerably more sensitive to antibody-mediated neutralization than the parent strain from which they were derived. Upon experimental infection of rhesus monkeys, these three variant strains replicated to viral loads at peak height around day 14 that were indistinguishable from or only slightly less than those observed in monkeys infected with the parental SIV239 strain. Viral loads at the set point 20 to 50 weeks after infection, however, were more than 400- to 10,000-fold lower with the variant strains. Depletion of B cells around the time of infection with M5 resulted in less effective immunological control and much higher viral loads at the set point in two of three monkeys. The differences between SIV239 infection, where there is not effective immunological control, and SIVM5 infection, where there is effective immunological control, cannot be easily explained by differences in the inherent replicative capacity of the viruses; rather, they are more readily explained by differences in the effectiveness of the antibody response. These results suggest that resistance of SIV239 to antibody-mediated neutralization is very important for evading effective immunological control, for allowing continuous viral replication, for maintenance of moderate-to- high viral loads at set point, and for disease progression.

    See More

External Sources

  1. No sources found.

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel