Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Transcript and protein expression profiles of the NCI-60 cancer cell panel: an integromic microarray study

  1. Author:
    Shankavaram, U. T.
    Reinhold, W. C.
    Nishizuka, S.
    Major, S.
    Morita, D.
    Chary, K. K.
    Reimers, M. A.
    Scherf, U.
    Kahn, A.
    Dolginow, D.
    Cossman, J.
    Kaldjian, E. P.
    Scudiero, D. A.
    Petricoin, E.
    Liotta, L.
    Lee, J. K.
    Weinstein, J. N.
  2. Author Address

    NCI, Genom & Bioinformat Grp, Mol Pharmacol Lab, Ctr Canc Res,NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA. US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off Informat Technol, Rockville, MD 20857 USA. Gene Log Inc, Gaithersburg, MD USA. NCI, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, Sci Applicat Int Corp, Frederick, MD 21701 USA. George Mason Univ, Manassas, VA USA.;Weinstein, JN, NCI, Genom & Bioinformat Grp, Mol Pharmacol Lab, Ctr Canc Res,NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.;weinstein@dtpax2.ncifcrf.gov
    1. Year: 2007
    2. Date: Mar
  1. Journal: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
    1. 6
    2. 3
    3. Pages: 820-832
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 1535-7163
  1. Abstract:

    To evaluate the utility of transcript profiling for prediction of protein expression levels, we compared profiles across the NCl-60 cancer cell panel, which represents nine tissues of origin. For that analysis, we present here two new NCl-60 transcript profile data sets (A based on Affymetrix HG-U95 and HG-U133A chips; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and one new protein profile data set (based on reverse-phase protein lysate arrays). The data sets are available online at http://discover.nci.nih.gov in the CelllMiner program package. Using the new transcript data in combination with our previously published cDNA array and Affymetrix HU6800 data sets, we first developed a "consensus set" of transcript profiles based on the four different microarray platforms. Using that set, we found that 65% of the genes showed statistically significant transcript-protein correlation, and the correlations were generally higher than those reported previously for panels of mammalian cells. Using the predictive analysis of microarray nearest shrunken centroid algorithm for functional prediction of tissue of origin, we then found that (a) the consensus mRNA set did better than did data from any of the individual mRNA platforms and (b) the protein data seemed to do somewhat better (P = 0.027) on a gene-for-gene basis in this particular study than did the consensus mRNA data, but both did well. Analysis based on the Gene Ontology showed protein levels of structure-related genes to be well predicted by mRNA levels (mean r = 0.71). Because the transcript-based technologies are more mature and are currently able to assess larger numbers of genes at one time, they continue to be useful, even when the ultimate aim is information about proteins.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-06-0650
  2. WOS: 000245082100004

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel