Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Estrogen Metabolism and Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women

  1. Author:
    Fuhrman, B. J.
    Schairer, C.
    Gail, M. H.
    Boyd-Morin, J.
    Xu, X.
    Sue, L. Y.
    Buys, S. S.
    Isaacs, C.
    Keefer, L. K.
    Veenstra, T. D.
    Berg, C. D.
    Hoover, R. N.
    Ziegler, R. G.
  2. Author Address

    [Fuhrman, Barbara J.] NCI, Hormonal & Reprod Epidemiol Branch, Epidemiol & Biostat Program, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet,NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA. [Boyd-Morin, Jennifer] Informat Management Serv Inc, Silver Spring, MD USA. [Xu, Xia; Veenstra, Timothy D.] NCI, Lab Prote & Analyt Technol, Adv Technol Program, SAIC Frederick Inc, Frederick, MD 21701 USA. [Buys, Saundra S.] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA. [Isaacs, Claudine] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Dept Med & Oncol, Washington, DC USA. [Keefer, Larry K.] NCI, Comparat Carcinogenesis Lab, Ctr Canc Res, Frederick, MD 21701 USA. [Berg, Christine D.] NCI, Early Detect Res Grp, Canc Prevent Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.;Fuhrman, BJ (reprint author), NCI, Hormonal & Reprod Epidemiol Branch, Epidemiol & Biostat Program, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet,NIH, 6120 Execut Blvd,Rm 5100, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA;fuhrmanb@mail.nih.gov
    1. Year: 2012
    2. Date: Feb
  1. Journal: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
    1. 104
    2. 4
    3. Pages: 326-339
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 0027-8874
  1. Abstract:

    Background Estrogens are recognized causal factors in breast cancer. Interindividual variation in estrogen metabolism may also influence the risk of breast cancer and could provide clues to mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis. Long-standing hypotheses about how estrogen metabolism might influence breast cancer have not been adequately evaluated in epidemiological studies because of the lack of accurate, reproducible, and high-throughput assays for estrogen metabolites. Methods We conducted a prospective case-control study nested within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). Participants included 277 women who developed invasive breast cancer (case subjects) and 423 matched control subjects; at PLCO baseline, all subjects were aged 55-74 years, postmenopausal and not using hormone therapy, and provided a blood sample. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure serum concentrations of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites, in unconjugated and conjugated forms, including the parent estrogens, estrone and estradiol, and estrogen metabolites in pathways defined by irreversible hydroxylation at the C-2, C-4, or C-16 positions of the steroid ring. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) approximating risk in highest vs lowest deciles of individual estrogens and estrogen metabolites, estrogens and estrogen metabolites grouped by metabolic pathways, and metabolic pathway ratios using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Nearly all estrogens, estrogen metabolites, and metabolic pathway groups were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; the serum concentration of unconjugated estradiol was strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer (HR = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 3.62). No estrogen, estrogen metabolite, or metabolic pathway group remained statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer after adjusting for unconjugated estradiol. The ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to parent estrogens (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.87) and the ratio of 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols to 4-hydroxylation pathway methylated catechols (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.72) were statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer and remained so after adjustment for unconjugated estradiol. Conclusions More extensive 2-hydroxylation of parent estrogens is associated with lower risk, and less extensive methylation of potentially genotoxic 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols is associated with higher risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr531
  2. WOS: 000300725100013

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2011-2012
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel