Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Clinical evaluation of human papillomavirus 16/18 oncoprotein test for cervical cancer screening and HPV positive women triage

  1. Author:
    Yu, Lulu
    Jiang, Mingyue
    Qu, Pengpeng
    Wu, Zeni
    Sun, Peisong
    Xi, Mingrong
    Qin, Yu
    Liu, Xin
    Liao, Guangdong
    Lei, Xiaoqin
    Sun, Lixin
    Zhang, Yongzhen
    Li, Zhifang
    Chen, Wen
    Qiao, You-Lin
  2. Author Address

    Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Natl Canc Ctr, Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China.Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Changzhi, Peoples R China.NCI, Tumor Virus RNA Biol Sect, RNA Biol Lab, Ctr Canc Res, Frederick, MD 21701 USA.Tianjin Cent Hosp Gynecol Obstet, Tianjin, Peoples R China.Sichuan Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Med Coll, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China.Hubei Univ Med, Dongfeng Hosp, Dept Clin Nutr, Shiyan, Hubei, Peoples R China.Shanxi Canc Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China.Shanxi Canc Hosp, Dept Epidemiol, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China.Changzhi Med Coll, Publ Hlth & Prevent Dept, Changzhi, Peoples R China.
    1. Year: 2018
    2. Date: Aug 15
  1. Journal: International Journal of Cancer
  2. WILEY,
    1. 143
    2. 4
    3. Pages: 813-822
  3. Type of Article: Article
  4. ISSN: 0020-7136
  1. Abstract:

    HPV-16 and -18 account for about 80% of cervical cancers. We evaluated the performance of HPV-16/18 oncoprotein to predict precancer and cancer in corresponding tissue biopsy specimens. 1,008 women attending cervical cancer screening program and 638 women referred to colposcopy with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) from 4 hospitals were recruited (1,646 in total). All women were tested OncoE6 (AVC), Liquid-Based Cytology (Hologic) and cobas HPV test (Roche). Colposcopy was performed on women with any abnormal results. The final diagnoses were based on a consensus panel review of the histology. There were 919 normal, 69 CIN1, 53 CIN2, 91 CIN3,474 squamous cell carcinoma(SCC) and 40 adenocarcinoma (ADC) cases, the prevalence of OncoE6 was 1.7%, 10.1%, 13.2%, 44.0%, 80.4% and 65.0%, respectively. The percent positive for cobas was higher than that of OncoE6 in detection of HPV16/18 in entire population (p< 0.001). However, the disparity of positive rate between these two tests became tiny among cervical cancer patients (CIN2: 26.4% vs. 13.2%, CIN3: 73.6% vs. 44.0%, SCC: 84.0% vs. 80.4%, ADC: 67.5% vs. 65.0%). OncoE6 was less sensitive than cobas (73.9% vs. 93.6%, p< 0.001), but more specific (97.1% vs. 75.4%, p< 0.001) for CIN3+ in entire population; OncoE6 yielded a sensitivity of 77.7% and a specificity of 91.0% for CIN3+ among cobas positive women, which can reduce nearly half of the colposcopy referral numbers. OncoE6 can be considered as a useful tool for cervical cancer screening and a potential powerful biomarker for HPV positive triage.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31368
  2. PMID: 29524206
  3. WOS: 000438203500010

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2017-2018
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel