Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Survey on Scientific Shared Resource Rigor and Reproducibility

  1. Author:
    Knudtson, Kevin L
    Carnahan, Robert H
    Hegstad-Davies, Rebecca L
    Fisher, Nancy C
    Hicks,Belynda
    Lopez, Peter A
    Meyn, Susan M
    Mische, Sheenah M
    Weis-Garcia, Frances
    White, Lisa D
    Sol-Church, Katia
  2. Author Address

    University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA., Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA., Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland 20877, USA., New York University (NYU) Langone Medical Center, New York, New York 10016, USA., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA., Baylor College Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; and., University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.,
    1. Year: 2019
    2. Date: Sep
    3. Epub Date: 2019 07 25
  1. Journal: Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT
    1. 30
    2. 3
    3. Pages: 36-44
  2. Type of Article: Article
  1. Abstract:

    Shared scientific resources, also known as core facilities, support a significant portion of the research conducted at biomolecular research institutions. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) established the Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CCoRRe) to further its mission of integrating advanced technologies, education, and communication in the operations of shared scientific resources in support of reproducible research. In order to first assess the needs of the scientific shared resource community, the CCoRRe solicited feedback from ABRF members via a survey. The purpose of the survey was to gain information on how U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives on advancing scientific rigor and reproducibility influenced current services and new technology development. In addition, the survey aimed to identify the challenges and opportunities related to implementation of new reporting requirements and to identify new practices and resources needed to ensure rigorous research. The results revealed a surprising unfamiliarity with the NIH guidelines. Many of the perceived challenges to the effective implementation of best practices (i.e., those designed to ensure rigor and reproducibility) were similarly noted as a challenge to effective provision of support services in a core setting. Further, most cores routinely use best practices and offer services that support rigor and reproducibility. These services include access to well-maintained instrumentation and training on experimental design and data analysis as well as data management. Feedback from this survey will enable the ABRF to build better educational resources and share critical best-practice guidelines. These resources will become important tools to the core community and the researchers they serve to impact rigor and transparency across the range of science and technology.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.7171/jbt.19-3003-001
  2. PMID: 31452645
  3. PMCID: PMC6657953
  4. PII : JBT_2019-3003-001

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2018-2019
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel