Skip NavigationSkip to Content

The utility of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation for preclinical characterization of nanomedicines

  1. Author:
    Hu,Yingwen
    Crist,Rachael
    Clogston,Jeffrey
  2. Author Address

    Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA., Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA. Jeffrey.Clogston@nih.gov.,
    1. Year: 2019
    2. Date: Nov 27
    3. Epub Date: 2019 11 27
  1. Journal: Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 1618-2642
  1. Abstract:

    Dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and reversed phase-high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) are staples of nanoparticle characterization for size distribution, shape/morphology, and composition, respectively. These techniques are simple and provide important details on sample characteristics. However, DLS and TEM are routinely done in batch-mode, while RP-HPLC affords separation of components within the entire sample population, regardless of sample polydispersity. While batch-mode analysis is informative and should be a first-step analysis for any material, it may not be ideal for polydisperse formulations, such as many nanomedicines. Herein, we describe the utility of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) as a useful tool for a more thorough understanding of these inherently polydisperse materials. AF4 was coupled with in-line DLS for an enhanced separation and resolution of various size populations in a nanomaterial. Additionally, the various size populations were collected for offline analysis by TEM for an assessment of different shape populations, or RP-HPLC to provide a compositional analysis of each individual size population. This technique was also extended to assess nanoparticle stability, i.e., drug release, both in buffer and physiologically relevant matrix, as well as qualitatively evaluate the protein binding capacity of nanomedicines. Overall, AF4 is proven to be a very versatile technique and can provide a wealth of information on a material 39;s polydispersity and stability. Moreover, the ability to conduct analysis in physiological matrices provides an advantage that many other routine analytical techniques do not. Graphical Abstract.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-019-02252-9
  2. PMID: 31776639
  3. WOS: 000499035600005
  4. PII : 10.1007/s00216-019-02252-9

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2019-2020
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel