Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Needs assessment for novel Gram-negative antibiotics in US hospitals: a retrospective cohort study

  1. Author:
    Strich, Jeffrey R
    Warner, Sarah
    Lai, Yi Ling
    Demirkale, Cumhur Y
    Powers,John
    Danner, Robert L
    Kadri, Sameer S
  2. Author Address

    Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Frederick, MD, USA. Electronic address: jeffrey.strich@nih.gov., Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA., Epidemiology Unit, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Frederick, MD, USA., Clinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, National Cancer Institute Campus, Frederick, MD, USA.,
    1. Year: 2020
    2. Date: OCT
    3. Epub Date: 2020 06 04
  1. Journal: The Lancet. Infectious diseases
    1. 20
    2. 10
    3. Pages: 1172-1181
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 1473-3099
  1. Abstract:

    Background Evidence-based needs assessments for novel antibiotics against highly-resistant Gram-negative infections (GNIs) are scarce. We aimed to use real-world data from an electronic health record repository to identify treatment opportunities in US hospitals for GNIs resistant to all first-line drugs. Methods For this retrospective cohort study, population estimates with an unmet need for novel Gram-negative antibiotics were quantified using the Cerner Health Facts database (2009-15), aggregating episodes of infection in US hospitals with pathogens displaying difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR; resistance to carbapenems, other beta-lactams, and fluoroquinolones) and episodes involving empirical coverage with reserve drugs (colistin or polymyxin B and aminoglycosides). Episodes displaying extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance (ECR) were also estimated. Episodes were multiplied by site-specific and fixed 14-day treatment durations for conservative and liberal days-of-therapy (DOT) estimates and stratified by site and taxon. Hospital type-specific DOT rates were reliability adjusted to account for random variation; cluster analyses quantified contribution from outbreaks. Findings Across 2 996 271 inpatient encounters and 134 hospitals, there were 1352 DTR-GNI episodes, 1765 episodes involving empirical therapy with colistin or polymyxin B, and 16 632 episodes involving aminoglycosides. Collectively, these yielded 39.0 (conservative estimate) to 138.2 (liberal estimate) DOT per 10 000 encounters for a novel DTR-GNI-targeted drug, whereas greater treatment opportunities were identified for ECR (six times greater) and beta-lactam susceptible GNIs (70 times greater). The most common DTR-GNI site and pathogen was lower respiratory (14.3 [43.3%] of 33 DOT per 10 000 encounters) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (522 [38.1%] of 1371 episodes), whereas Enterobacteriaceae urinary-tract infections dominated the ECR or carbapenem-sparing niche (59.0% [5589 of 9535 episodes]) equating to 210.7 DOT per 10 000 encounters. DTR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Burkholderia spp, and Achromobacter spp represented less than 1 DOT per 10 000 encounters each. The estimated need for DTR-GNI-targeted antibiotics saw minor contributions by outbreaks and varied from 0.5 to 73.1 DOT per 10 000 encounters by hospital type. Interpretation Suspected or documented GNIs with no or suboptimal treatment options are relatively infrequent. Non-revenue-based strategies and innovative trial designs are probably essential to the development of antibiotics with improved effectiveness for these GNIs. Copyright (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30153-5
  2. PMID: 32505231
  3. WOS: 000580053900040
  4. PII : S1473-3099(20)30153-5

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2019-2020
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel