Skip NavigationSkip to Content
Return Return to Search Results

Areca Nut and Betel Quid Control Interventions: Halting the Epidemic

  1. Author:
    Das, Anita
    Orlan, Elizabeth [ORCID]
    Duncan, Kalina
    Thomas, Heather
    Ndumele, Amara
    Ilbawi, Andre
    Parascandola, Mark

  2. Author Address

    Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA., Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA., Center for Global Health, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA., Division of General Surgery, Juravinski Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada., School of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA., Department for Management of Noncommunicable Diseases, Disability, Violence and Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland., Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,
    1. Year: 2020
    2. Date: JUN 1
  2. Journal: Substance use & misuse
    1. 55
    2. 9
    3. Pages: 1552-1559
  4. Type of Article: Article
  5. ISSN: 1082-6084
  1. Abstract:

    Background: Areca nut (AN) and betel quid (BQ) are classified as Group 1 carcinogens. There are approximately 600 million AN/BQ users globally; the majority of users live in the Asia-Pacific region which, correspondingly, has the highest rates of oral cancer. Despite significant disease burden associated with AN/BQ use, there have been no systematic reviews of interventions to reduce product use. Objectives: To analyze interventions that prevent use of AN/BQ, present a basis for a future systematic review on the topic, and provide decision makers with examples of strategies that have demonstrated reduced AN/BQ use. Methods: To identify publications, we searched the literature using terms for AN/BQ and related synonyms in three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Interventions that prevent AN/BQ use, that are published in English and that provide original data analysis, were included in this review. Interventions focused primarily on disease outcomes e.g. oral cancers (secondary prevention) were excluded. Results: Our search revealed 21 interventions targeting AN/BQ use between 1990 and 2018. Strategies include product bans, media campaigns, education, cessation, and taxation at individual and population levels, with varying evidence of impact. While these studies yielded some novel and promising findings, particularly regarding the impact of product bans, mass media campaigns, and cessation interventions, research on interventions specific to AN/BQ use remains limited. Conclusions: We have assessed published interventions that reduce AN/BQ use and identified future research priorities. These findings can be used to develop evidence-based interventions and help guide policymakers in implementing evidence-based policy to regulate these products.

    See More

  1. Keywords:

External Sources

  1. View Full Text
  2. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1686022
  3. PMID: 32569544
  4. View record in Web of Science®
  5. WOS: 000544454800022

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2019-2020
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel