Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning to Improve Generalizability of an Automated Prostate Segmentation Model

  1. Author:
    Sanford, Thomas H.
    Zhang, Ling
    Harmon,Stephanie
    Sackett, Jonathan
    Yang, Dong
    Roth, Holger
    Xu, Ziyue
    Kesani, Deepak
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Baroni, Ronaldo H.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Girometti, Rossano
    Oto, Aytekin
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Xu, Sheng
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Xu, Daguang
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
  2. Author Address

    NCI, Ctr Canc Res, NIH, Bldg 10,Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.NVIDIA Corp, Bethesda, MD USA.Frederick Natl Lab Canc Res, Clin Res Directorate, Frederick, MD USA.Albert Einstein Hosp, Diagnost Imaging Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil.Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England.Univ Udine, Dept Radiol, Udine, Italy.Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL USA.Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA.
    1. Year: 2020
    2. Date: DEC
  1. Journal: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
  2. AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC,
    1. 215
    2. 6
    3. Pages: 1403-1410
  3. Type of Article: Article
  4. ISSN: 0361-803X
  1. Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE. Deep learning applications in radiology often suffer from overfitting, limiting generalization to external centers. The objective of this study was to develop a high-quality prostate segmentation model capable of maintaining a high degree of performance across multiple independent datasets using transfer learning and data augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective cohort of 648 patients who underwent prostate MRI between February 2015 and November 2018 at a single center was used for training and validation. A deep learning approach combining 2D and 3D architecture was used for training, which incorporated transfer learning. A data augmentation strategy was used that was specific to the deformations, intensity, and alterations in image quality seen on radiology images. Five independent datasets, four of which were from outside centers, were used for testing, which was conducted with and without fine-tuning of the original model. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to evaluate model performance. RESULTS. When prostate segmentation models utilizing transfer learning were applied to the internal validation cohort, the mean Dice similarity coefficient was 93.1 for whole prostate and 890 for transition one segmentations. When the models were applied to multiple test set cohorts, the improvement in performance achieved using data augmentation alone was 2.2% for the whole prostate models and 3.0% for the transition zone segmentation models. However, the best test-set results were obtained with models fine-tuned on test center data with mean Dice similarity coefficients of 91.5 for whole prostate segmentation and 89.7 for transition zone segmentation. CONCLUSION. Transfer learning allowed for the development of a high-performing prostate segmentation model, and data augmentation and fine-tuning approaches improved performance of a prostate segmentation model when applied to datasets from external centers.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22347
  2. WOS: 000592555200019

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2020-2021
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel