Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Ni(II) specifically cleaves the C-terminal tail of the major variant of histone H2A and forms an oxidative damage mediating complex with the cleaved-off octapeptide

  1. Author:
    Bal, W.
    Liang, R. T.
    Lukszo, J.
    Lee, S. H.
    Dizdaroglu, M.
    Kasprzak, K. S.
  2. Author Address

    Bal W NCI, KSK, Comparat Carcinogenesis Lab, FCRDC Bldg 538,Rm 205 Frederick, MD 21702 USA NCI, KSK, Comparat Carcinogenesis Lab, FCRDC Frederick, MD 21702 USA NIAID, Chem Sci & Technol Lab Rockville, MD 20852 USA Univ Wroclaw, Fac Chem PL-50383 Wroclaw Poland
    1. Year: 2000
  1. Journal: Chemical Research in Toxicology
    1. 13
    2. 7
    3. Pages: 616-624
  2. Type of Article: Article
  1. Abstract:

    The acetyl-TESHHK-amide peptide, modeling a part of the C-terminal "tail" of histone H2A, was found previously by us to undergo at pH 7.4 a Ni(II)-assisted hydrolysis of the E-S peptide bond with formation of a stronger Ni(II) complex with the SHHK-amide product [Bal, W., et al. (1998) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 11, 1014-1023]. To further characterize the hydrolysis and test the resulting Ni(II) complex for redox activity, bovine histone H2A and three peptides were investigated: acetyl-LLGKVTIAQGGVLPNIQAVLLPKKTESHHKAKGK (H2A(34)), modeling the entire "C-tail" of H2A; SHHKAKGK (H2A(8)), modeling the cutoff product of hydrolysis; and acetyl-KTESHKAKGK (H2A(10)), modeling a putative Ni(II) binding site in a minor variant H2A.4 of human histone H2A. The Ni(II)-assisted hydrolysis of H2A and H2A(34) was found to proceed approximately 7-fold faster than that of the Ni(II)- acetyl-TESHHK-amide complex under comparable conditions. In both cases, the Ni(II) complex with H2A(8) was the smaller product of the hydrolysis, indicating a high site specificity of the reaction. Of three other metals tested with H2A(34), only Cu(II) cleaved the E-S bond, although much less efficiently than Ni(II); Co(II) and Zn(II) had no effect whatsoever. The H2A(10) peptide appeared to be fully resistant to hydrolytic cleavage and did not exhibit any redox activity versus H2O2 in the presence of Ni(II) at pH 7.4. Likewise, redox-inactive was the Ni(II)-H2A(34) complex. In contrast, the Ni(II)-H2A(8) complex promoted oxidative damage of pUC19 DNA by H2O2, evidenced by a significant increase in the number of single strand breaks and nucleobase modifications typical for a hydroxyl radical-like species attack on DNA. Interestingly, instead of 8-oxopurines, the corresponding formamidopyrimidines were the major products of the damage. The difference in redox activity between the Ni(II)-H2A(34) and Ni(II)-H2A8 complexes is most likely associated with their different geometries: octahedral and square planar, respectively. Incubation of the Ni(II)-H2A8 complex with H2O2 also resulted in degradation of the peptide ligand, especially at its Ser and His residues. Thus, binding of Ni(II) to the ESHHK motif of the histone H2A C-tail is damaging to the histone C-terminal tail and to histone-associated DNA. The results support a dual mechanism of Ni(II)-induced carcinogenesis, including both genotoxic and epigenetic effects. [References: 54]

    See More

External Sources

  1. No sources found.

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel