Skip NavigationSkip to Content

A Comprehensive Investigation of Active Learning Strategies for Conducting Anti-Cancer Drug Screening

  1. Author:
    Vasanthakumari, Priyanka [ORCID]
    Zhu, Yitan
    Brettin, Thomas
    Partin, Alexander [ORCID]
    Shukla, Maulik
    Xia, Fangfang [ORCID]
    Narykov, Oleksandr [ORCID]
    Weil,Michael
    Stevens, Rick L
  2. Author Address

    Division of Data Science and Learning, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA., Computing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA., Cancer Research Technology Program, Cancer Data Science Initiatives, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21701, USA., Department of Computer Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.,
    1. Year: 2024
    2. Date: Jan 26
    3. Epub Date: 2024 01 26
  1. Journal: Cancers
    1. 16
    2. 3
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. Article Number: 530
  1. Abstract:

    It is well-known that cancers of the same histology type can respond differently to a treatment. Thus, computational drug response prediction is of paramount importance for both preclinical drug screening studies and clinical treatment design. To build drug response prediction models, treatment response data need to be generated through screening experiments and used as input to train the prediction models. In this study, we investigate various active learning strategies of selecting experiments to generate response data for the purposes of (1) improving the performance of drug response prediction models built on the data and (2) identifying effective treatments. Here, we focus on constructing drug-specific response prediction models for cancer cell lines. Various approaches have been designed and applied to select cell lines for screening, including a random, greedy, uncertainty, diversity, combination of greedy and uncertainty, sampling-based hybrid, and iteration-based hybrid approach. All of these approaches are evaluated and compared using two criteria: (1) the number of identified hits that are selected experiments validated to be responsive, and (2) the performance of the response prediction model trained on the data of selected experiments. The analysis was conducted for 57 drugs and the results show a significant improvement on identifying hits using active learning approaches compared with the random and greedy sampling method. Active learning approaches also show an improvement on response prediction performance for some of the drugs and analysis runs compared with the greedy sampling method.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030530
  2. PMID: 38339281
  3. PMCID: PMC10854925
  4. PII : cancers16030530

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2023-2024
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel