Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Close-range electrostatic interactions in proteins

  1. Author:
    Kumar, S.
    Nussinov, R.
  2. Author Address

    NCI Frederick, Intramural Res Support Program, SAIC, Bldg 469,Room 151, Frederick, MD 21702 USA NCI Frederick, Intramural Res Support Program, SAIC, Frederick, MD 21702 USA Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Sackler Inst Mol Med, Dept Human Genet & Mol Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel NCI Frederick, Lab Expt & Computat Biol, Frederick, MD 21702 USA Nussinov R NCI Frederick, Intramural Res Support Program, SAIC, Bldg 469,Room 151, Frederick, MD 21702 USA
    1. Year: 2002
  1. Journal: Chembiochem
    1. 3
    2. 7
    3. Pages: 604-617
  2. Type of Article: Review
  1. Abstract:

    Two types of noncovalent bonding interactions are present in protein structures, specifics and nonspecific. Nonspecific interactions are mostly hydrophobic and van der Waals. Specific interactions are largely electrostatic. While the hydrophobic effect is the major driving force in protein folding, electrostatic interactions are important in protein folding, stability flexibility, and function. Here we review the role of close-range electrostatic interactions (salt bridges) and their networks in proteins. Salt bridges are formed by spatially proximal pairs of oppositely charged residues in native protein structures. Often salt-bridging residues are also close in the protein sequence and fall in the same secondary structural element, building block, autonomous folding unit, domain, or subunit, consistent with the hierarchical model for protein folding. Recent evidence also suggest that charges and polar residues in largely hydrophobic interfaces may act as hot spots for binding. Salt bridges are rarely found across protein parts which are joined by flexible hinges, a fact suggesting that salt bridges constrain flexibility and motion. While conventional chemical intuition expects that salt bridges contribute favorably to protein stability, recent computational and experimental evidence shows that salt bridges can be stabilizing or destabilizing. Due to systemic protein flexibility, reflected in small-scale side-chain and backbone atom motions, salt bridges and their stabilities fluctuate in proteins. At the same time, genome-wide, amino acid sequence composition, structural, and thermodynamic comparisons of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins indicate that significantly towards the thermophilic mesophilic protein stability differential.

    See More

External Sources

  1. No sources found.

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel