Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: A matter of pre-existing populations

  1. Author:
    Ma, B. Y.
    Shatsky, M.
    Wolfson, H. J.
    Nussinov, R.
  2. Author Address

    NCI, Lab Expt & Computat Biol, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, Bldg 469, Room 151, Frederick, MD 21702 USA. NCI, Lab Expt & Computat Biol, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, Frederick, MD 21702 USA. Tel Aviv Univ, Raymond & Beverly Sackler Fac Exact Sci, Sch Comp Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel. NCI, Intramural Res Support Program, SAIC, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, Lab Expt & Computat, Frederick, MD 21702 USA. Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Dept Human Genet, Sackler Inst Mol Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel. Nussinov R NCI, Lab Expt & Computat Biol, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, Bldg 469, Room 151, Frederick, MD 21702 USA.
    1. Year: 2002
  1. Journal: Protein Science
    1. 11
    2. 2
    3. Pages: 184-197
  2. Type of Article: Review
  1. Abstract:

    Here, we comment on the steadily increasing body of data showing that proteins with specificity actually bind ligands of diverse shapes, sizes, and composition. Such a phenomenon is not surprising when one considers that binding is a dynamic process with populations in equilibrium and that the shape of the binding site is strongly influenced by the molecular partner. It derives implicitly from the concept of populations. All proteins, specific and nonspecific, exist in ensembles of substates. If the library of ligands in solution is large enough, favorably matching ligands with altered shapes and sizes can be expected to bind, with a redistribution of the protein populations. Point mutations at spatially distant sites may exert large conformational rearrangements and hinge effects, consistent with mutations away from the binding site leading to population shifts and (cross-)drug resistance. A similar effect is observed in protein superfamilies, in which different sequences with similar topologies display similar large-scale dynamic motions. The hinges are frequently at analogous sites, yet with different substrate specificity. Similar topologies yield similar conformational isomers, although with different distributions of population times, owing to the change in the conditions, that is, the change in the sequences. In turn, different distributions relate to binding of different sizes and shapes. Hence, the binding site shape and size are defined by the ligand. They are not independent entities of fixed proportions and cannot be analyzed independently of the binding partner. Such a proposition derives from viewing proteins as dynamic distributions, presenting to the incoming ligands a range of binding site shapes. It illustrates how presumably specific binding molecules can bind multiple ligands. In terms of drug design, the ability of a single receptor to recognize many dissimilar ligands shows the need to consider more diverse molecules. It provides a rationale for higher affinity inhibitors that are not derived from substrates at their transition states and indicates flexible docking schemes.

    See More

External Sources

  1. No sources found.

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel