Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Does genetic introgression improve female reproductive performance? A test on the endangered Florida panther

  1. Author:
    Hostetler, J. A.
    Onorato, D. P.
    Bolker, B. M.
    Johnson, W. E.
    O'Brien, S. J.
    Jansen, D.
    Oli, M. K.
  2. Author Address

    [Hostetler, Jeffrey A.; Oli, Madan K.] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA. [Onorato, David P.] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, Naples, FL 34114 USA. [Bolker, Benjamin M.] McMaster Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Hamilton, ON L86 4K1, Canada. [Bolker, Benjamin M.] McMaster Univ, Dept Biol, Hamilton, ON L86 4K1, Canada. [Johnson, Warren E.; O'Brien, Stephen J.] Natl Canc Inst, Lab Genom Div, Frederick, MD 21702 USA. [Jansen, Deborah] Big Cypress Natl Preserve, Ochopee, FL 34141 USA.;Hostetler, JA (reprint author), Natl Zool Pk, Migratory Bird Ctr, Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Washington, DC 20013 USA;hostetlerj@si.edu
    1. Year: 2012
    2. Date: Jan
  1. Journal: Oecologia
    1. 168
    2. 1
    3. Pages: 289-300
  2. Type of Article: Article
  3. ISSN: 0029-8549
  1. Abstract:

    Genetic introgression has been suggested as a management tool for mitigating detrimental effects of inbreeding depression, but the role of introgression in species conservation has been controversial, partly because population-level impacts of genetic introgressions are not well understood. Concerns about potential inbreeding depression in the endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) led to the release of eight female Texas pumas (P. c. stanleyana) into the Florida panther population in 1995. We used long-term reproductive data (1995-2008) collected from 61 female Florida panthers to estimate and model reproduction probability (probability of producing a litter) and litter size, and to investigate the influence of intentional genetic introgression on these parameters. Overall, 6-month probability of reproduction (+/- 1SE) was 0.232 +/- 0.021 and average litter size was 2.60 +/- 0.09. Although F(1) admixed females had a lower reproduction probability than females with other ancestries, this was most likely because kittens born to F(1) females survive better; consequently, these females are unavailable for breeding until kittens are independent. There was no evidence for the effect of ancestry on litter size or of heterozygosity on probability of reproduction or litter size. In contrast, earlier studies have shown that genetic introgression positively affected Florida panther survival. Our results, along with those of earlier studies, clearly suggest that genetic introgression can have differential effects on components of fitness and highlight the importance of examining multiple demographic parameters when evaluating the effects of management actions.

    See More

External Sources

  1. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2083-0
  2. WOS: 000299058100027

Library Notes

  1. Fiscal Year: FY2011-2012
NCI at FrederickClose Button

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel