Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Protein folding: Binding of conformationally fluctuating building blocks via population selection

  1. Author:
    Tsai, C. J.
    Ma, B. Y.
    Kumar, S.
    Wolfson, H.
    Nussinov, R.
  2. Author Address

    NCI, Intramural Res Support Program, SAIC, Lab Expt & Computat Biol, Bldg 469, Rm 151, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA. NCI, Intramural Res Support Program, SAIC, Lab Expt & Computat Biol, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA. Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Exact Sci, Sch Comp Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel. Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Dept Human Genet & Mol Med, Sackler Inst Mol MEd, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel. Tsai CJ NCI, Intramural Res Support Program, SAIC, Lab Expt & Computat Biol, Bldg 469, Rm 151, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA.
    1. Year: 2001
  1. Journal: Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    1. 36
    2. 5
    3. Pages: 399-433
  2. Type of Article: Review
  1. Abstract:

    Here we review different aspects of the protein folding literature. We present a broad range of observations, showing them to be consistent with a general hierarchical protein folding model. In such a model, local relatively stable, conformationally fluctuating building blocks bind through population selection, to yield the native state. The model includes several components: (1) the fluctuating building blocks that constitute local minima along the polypeptide chain, which even if unstable still possess higher population times than all alternate conformations; (2) the landscape around the bottom of the funnels; (3) the consideration that protein folding involves intramolecular recognition; (4) similar landscapes are observed for folding and for binding, and that (5) the landscape is dynamic, changing with the conditions. The model considers protein folding to be guided by native interactions. The reviewed literature includes the effects of changing the conditions, intermediates and kinetic traps, mutations, similar topologies, fragment complementation experiments, fragments and pathways, focusing on one specific well-studied example, that of the dihydrofolate reductase, chaperones, and chaperonines, in vivo vs. in vitro folding, still using the dihydrofolate example, amyloid formation, and molecular "disorder". These are consistent with the view that binding and folding are similar events, with the differences stemming from different stabilities and hence population times.

    See More

External Sources

  1. No sources found.

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel