Skip NavigationSkip to Content

Studies of Protein-Protein Interfaces - a Statistical Analysis of the Hydrophobic Effect

  1. Author:
    Tsai, C. J.
    Lin, S. L.
    Wolfson, H. J.
    Nussinov, R.
  2. Author Address

    Nussinov R NCI MATH BIOL LAB FCRF SAIC BLDG 469 RM 151 FREDERICK, MD 21702 USA NCI MATH BIOL LAB FCRF SAIC FREDERICK, MD 21702 USA TEL AVIV UNIV SCH MATH SCI DEPT COMP SCI IL-69978 TEL AVIV ISRAEL TEL AVIV UNIV SACKLER INST MOL MED IL-69978 TEL AVIV ISRAEL
    1. Year: 1997
  1. Journal: Protein Science
    1. 6
    2. 1
    3. Pages: 53-64
  2. Type of Article: Article
  1. Abstract:

    Data sets of 362 structurally nonredundant protein-protein interfaces and of 57 symmetry-related oligomeric interfaces have been used to explore whether the hydrophobic effect that guides protein folding is also the main driving force for protein-protein associations. The buried nonpolar surface area has been used to measure the hydrophobic effect. Our analysis indicates that, although the hydrophobic effect plays a dominant role in protein-protein binding, it is not as strong as that observed in the interior of protein monomers. Comparison of the interiors of the monomers with those of the interfaces reveals that, in general, the hydrophobic amino acids are more frequent in the interior of the monomers than in the interior of the protein-protein interfaces. On the other hand, a higher proportion of charged and polar residues are buried at the interfaces, suggesting that hydrogen bonds and ion pairs contribute more to the stability of protein binding than to that of protein folding. Moreover, comparison of the interior of the interfaces to protein surfaces indicates that the interfaces are poorer in polar/charged than the surfaces and are richer in hydrophobic residues. The interior of the interfaces appears to constitute a compromise between the stabilization contributed by the hydrophobic effect on the one hand and avoiding patches on the protein surfaces that are too hydrophobic on the other. Such patches would be unfavorable for the unassociated monomers in solution. We conclude that, although the types of interactions are similar between protein-protein interfaces and single-chain proteins overall, the contribution of the hydrophobic effect to protein-protein associations is not as strong as to protein folding. This implies that packing patterns and interatom, or interresidue, pairwise potential functions, derived from monomers, are not ideally suited to predicting and assessing ligand associations or design. These would perform adequately only in cases where the hydrophobic effect at the binding site is substantial. [References: 24]

    See More

External Sources

  1. No sources found.

Library Notes

  1. No notes added.
NCI at Frederick

You are leaving a government website.

This external link provides additional information that is consistent with the intended purpose of this site. The government cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.

Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by this institution or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site. You will be subject to the destination site's privacy policy when you follow the link.

ContinueCancel